翻訳と辞書 |
National Research Development Corporation v Commissioner of Patents : ウィキペディア英語版 | National Research Development Corporation v Commissioner of Patents
In Australian patent law, the NRDC case, i.e. ''National Research Development Corporation v Commissioner of Patents (1959) 102 CLR 252'', has been important in clarifying what is meant by ‘manner of manufacture’ in respects of patent applications. The references to the Patents Act in this case refer to the ''Australian Patents Act'' 1952 (Cth) which was later repealed by the introduction of the (Patents Act 1990 ). ==Facts==
The National Research Development Corporation (NRDC) discovered a new method to apply known chemicals to the soil so as to kill weeds but not the crops. The chemicals were known to science but were never used in the process of eradicating weeds. NRDC applied for a patents for the new process. The Commissioner of Patents rejected the application on the grounds that it was not a “manner of manufacture” under section 6 of the Statute of Monopolies because - 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)』 ■ウィキペディアで「National Research Development Corporation v Commissioner of Patents」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|